Gustavo Marqués ; Diego Weisman - Not anything goes: a case for a restricted pluralism

jpe:10571 - Journal of Philosophical Economics, November 20, 2008, Volume II Issue 1 - https://doi.org/10.46298/jpe.10571
Not anything goes: a case for a restricted pluralismArticle

Authors: Gustavo Marqués 1; Diego Weisman 1

  • 1 Universitad de Buenos Aires = University of Buenos Aires [Argentina]

The current discussion on theoretical and methodological pluralism is plagued with confusions and misunderstandings. Some problems arise because an appropriate framework for conducting a fruitful discussion about these issues is still lacking. Many other problems derive from the fact that a rational pluralist should be both tolerant with the many different points of view and able to discriminate among them. In the first and second sections we use some of Mäki's ideas for developing a general framework for discussing pluralism and apply it to the ongoing debate on theoretical and methodological pluralism, showing its strong compromise with demarcationism. In the third section a looser framework for approaching pluralism is outlined, and a detailed discussion of Caldwell's critical pluralism is conducted, pointing out its achievements and some of its shortcomings. The fourth section provides an outline of what a sound notion of restricted pluralism should encompass for avoiding "anything goes".


Volume: Volume II Issue 1
Section: Articles
Published on: November 20, 2008
Imported on: December 28, 2022
Keywords: pluralism,methodology,rationality,[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences

Consultation statistics

This page has been seen 181 times.
This article's PDF has been downloaded 177 times.