Mariusz Maziarz - A review of the Granger-causality fallacy

jpe:10676 - Journal of Philosophical Economics, May 20, 2015, Volume VIII Issue 2 -
A review of the Granger-causality fallacy

Authors: Mariusz Maziarz

    Methods used to infer causal relations from data rather than knowledge of mechanisms are most helpful and exploited only if the theoretical background is insufficient or experimentation impossible. The review of literature shows that when an investigator has no prior knowledge of the researched phenomenon, no result of the Grangercausality test has any epistemic utility due to different possible interpretations. (1) Rejecting the null in one of the tests can be interpreted as either a true causal relation, opposite direction of the true causation, instant causality, time series cointegration, not frequent enough sampling, etc. (2) Bi-directional Granger causality can be read either as instant causality or common cause fallacy. (3) Non-rejection of both nulls possibly means either indirect or nonlinear causality, or no causal relation.

    Volume: Volume VIII Issue 2
    Section: Articles
    Published on: May 20, 2015
    Imported on: December 28, 2022
    Keywords: Granger-causality,epistemology of causality,causality testing,[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences


    Consultation statistics

    This page has been seen 139 times.
    This article's PDF has been downloaded 124 times.